Laker Basketball, as it should be:
Lakers 123, Nuggets 104
Laker stats:
Los Angeles Lakers (22-11)
Field Goals Rebounds
pos min fgm-a 3pm-a ftm-a off def tot ast pf st to bs pts
S.Parker G 29:29 9-14 3-4 2-2 0 3 3 4 3 2 1 0 23
K.Bryant G 27:36 2-9 1-4 3-4 1 4 5 10 3 0 3 0 8
B.Cook F 23:54 6-10 2-2 2-2 1 3 4 3 2 0 1 0 16
L.Walton F 26:19 7-12 4-5 0-0 0 5 5 8 0 0 2 0 18
A.Bynum C 28:43 8-9 0-0 3-4 4 6 10 3 2 1 1 6 19
V.Radmanovic 23:08 1-9 1-3 0-0 1 2 3 3 2 0 0 1 3
M.Evans 22:01 7-12 1-2 1-1 1 2 3 1 3 1 0 0 16
R.Turiaf 19:17 3-7 0-0 2-6 4 5 9 2 0 0 2 1 8
J.Farmar 14:22 3-5 1-2 2-2 0 3 3 1 0 1 0 0 9
S.Vujacic 13:13 1-7 0-5 1-1 1 0 1 2 0 2 0 0 3
S.Williams 07:03 0-2 0-1 0-0 1 1 2 2 0 0 2 0 0
A.McKie 04:55 0-0 0-0 0-0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0
L.Odom - - -
C.Mihm - - -
K.Brown - - -
Total 240 47-96 13-28 16-22 14 34 48 39 15 7 13 8 123
49.0% 46.4% 72.7% Team Rebs: 12 Total TO: 13
Kobe with more assists (10) than shot attempts (9), five players in double figures (Parker, Cook, Walton, Bynum, Evans), 8 blocked shots (Bynum 6), nearly 50% team shooting... lovely
Lakers 123, Nuggets 104
Laker stats:
Los Angeles Lakers (22-11)
Field Goals Rebounds
pos min fgm-a 3pm-a ftm-a off def tot ast pf st to bs pts
S.Parker G 29:29 9-14 3-4 2-2 0 3 3 4 3 2 1 0 23
K.Bryant G 27:36 2-9 1-4 3-4 1 4 5 10 3 0 3 0 8
B.Cook F 23:54 6-10 2-2 2-2 1 3 4 3 2 0 1 0 16
L.Walton F 26:19 7-12 4-5 0-0 0 5 5 8 0 0 2 0 18
A.Bynum C 28:43 8-9 0-0 3-4 4 6 10 3 2 1 1 6 19
V.Radmanovic 23:08 1-9 1-3 0-0 1 2 3 3 2 0 0 1 3
M.Evans 22:01 7-12 1-2 1-1 1 2 3 1 3 1 0 0 16
R.Turiaf 19:17 3-7 0-0 2-6 4 5 9 2 0 0 2 1 8
J.Farmar 14:22 3-5 1-2 2-2 0 3 3 1 0 1 0 0 9
S.Vujacic 13:13 1-7 0-5 1-1 1 0 1 2 0 2 0 0 3
S.Williams 07:03 0-2 0-1 0-0 1 1 2 2 0 0 2 0 0
A.McKie 04:55 0-0 0-0 0-0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0
L.Odom - - -
C.Mihm - - -
K.Brown - - -
Total 240 47-96 13-28 16-22 14 34 48 39 15 7 13 8 123
49.0% 46.4% 72.7% Team Rebs: 12 Total TO: 13
Kobe with more assists (10) than shot attempts (9), five players in double figures (Parker, Cook, Walton, Bynum, Evans), 8 blocked shots (Bynum 6), nearly 50% team shooting... lovely
posted by:
|
Unsubscribed |
-
Re: Like to see more of this:
Sat, January 6, 2007 - 1:27 PMI just think it's great the Suns are streaking and the Lakers are only 2.5 games behind them. Of course they'd be head and shoulders above the teams in the East... -
-
Unsu...
Re: Like to see more of this:
Sat, January 6, 2007 - 8:45 PMthere are a lot of bad basketball teams out there, no doubt
too bad it's not like european football where teams can drop or go up a classification based on how good they are
-
Re: Like to see more of this:
Sat, January 6, 2007 - 9:21 PMYup,
Just hang in there until we get Odom back !!!!!!!!!!!!!!! -
-
Re: Like to see more of this:
Sun, January 7, 2007 - 1:18 PMThis would be a great season to consider seeding teams with the best records like in the NCAA....it's a shame a team from the east that will most likely finish way under .500 will make into the playoffs when there are more deserving teams in the west... -
-
Re: Like to see more of this:
Sun, January 7, 2007 - 9:13 PMJust wait tell Lamar and Kwame are back! -
-
Re: Like to see more of this:
Mon, January 8, 2007 - 7:00 AMI found this on the Sporting News Board:
Since Lamar has been out, the Lakers overall record is 9-5 (.643). With Kwame Brown out, the Lakers are 3-0.
They are 5-4 on the road & 4-1 at home.
Their record against teams with winning records during this time is 6-3. They are 3-2 against teams with losing records.
When Lamar went out, the Lakers had the 5th best record in the NBA. Three weeks later, they STILL have the 5th best record in the NBA.
Want to hear another interesting tidbit? I know you do ....
The Lakers are currently 9-2 (.818) against the seven other teams in the top 8 in the Western Conference [DAL 1-1, PHO 1-0, UT 1-1, SA 1-0, HOU 2-0, MIN 2-0, DEN 1-0].
Additionally, they are probably the ONLY TEAM in the NBA that can boast wins against DAL, PHO, SA & UT. -
-
Re: Like to see more of this:
Mon, January 8, 2007 - 10:30 PMWe are very deeeeeeeeeeeeeeep this year, quite possibly could win a title, we have a plethera of big men! -
-
Unsu...
Re: Maybe Not Yet
Thu, January 11, 2007 - 11:20 AMA title is possible, but I think not yet. We are very young and inexperienced... as shown by the debacle against Houston the other night. At our best, we can beat anybody, the problem is: we can just as easily lose to anybody. Not consistent yet. -
-
Re: Maybe Not Yet
Fri, January 12, 2007 - 3:29 PMYeah although until they are eliminated from the playoffs I will believe they can win a title but I believed the same thing throught he Elden Campbell years. I think a few teams in the West would have to tank for us to win a title this year. But I can feel one building... -
-
This is the maximum depth. Additional responses will not be threaded.Unsu...
Re: Maybe Not Yet
Sat, January 13, 2007 - 2:51 AMYeah, I think we are headed for sure in the right direction!
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
